h three items: a sword, symbolising the coercive power of a court; scales, representing an objective standard by which competing claims are weighed; and a blindfold indicating that justice should be impartial and meted out objectively, without fear or favor and regardless of money, wealth, power or identity.
Justice, in its broadest context, includes both the attainment of that which is just and the philosophical discussion of that which is just. The concept of justice is based on numerous fields, and many differing viewpoints and perspectives including the concepts of moral correctness based on law, equity, ethics, rationality, religion, and fairness. Often, the general discussion of justice is divided into the realm of societal justice as found in philosophy, theology and religion, and, procedural justice as found in the study and application of the law.
The concept of justice differs in every culture. An early theory of justice was set out by the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato in his work The Republic. Throughout history various theories have been established. Advocates of divine command theory argue that justice issues from God. In the 1600s, theorists like John Locke argued for the theory of natural law. Thinkers in the social contract tradition argued that justice is derived from the mutual agreement of everyone concerned. In the 1800s, utilitarian thinkers including John Stuart Mill argued that justice is what has the best consequences. Theories of distributive justice concern what is distributed, between whom they are to be distributed, and what is the proper distribution. Egalitarians argued that justice can only exist within the coordinates of equality. John Rawls used a social contract argument to show that justice, and especially distributive justice, is a form of fairness. Property rights theorists (like Robert Nozick) also take a consequentialist view of distributive justice and argue that property rights-based justice maximizes the overall wealth of an economic system. Theories of retributive justice are concerned with punishment for wrongdoing. Restorative justice (also sometimes called "reparative justice") is an approach to justice that focuses on the needs of victims and offenders.
WHAT PART OF THOSE THAT WAS KILLED IS NOT A PART OF WE OUR, US?
All those that was killed Are interconnected to each one of us Genetically meaning when we march, protest, rally for Trayvon, Troy Davis, Emmett Till, Tawana Brawley and the likes of, we are actually marching, rallying, protesting for DIVINE JUST FOR US ALL.
To not especially in these Divine Windows of Divine knowing times, not believing, Knowing times,;
JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON MARTIN, JUSTICE FOR WE OUR, US
JUSTICE FOR EMMETT TILL, JUSTICE FOR WE OUR, US
JUSTICE FOR TROY DAVIS, JUSTICE FOR WE OUR, US
JUSTICE FOR TAWANA BRAWLEY, JUSTICE FOR WE OUR, US
JUSTICE FOR OUR ENSLAVED ANCESTORS...DIVINE JUSTICE MEANING WE DECIDE THE JUSTICE, AND THE JUSTICE IS REPARATIONS NOW.
To not do so, means that we see people at these marches...and the likes of disconnected from the real and raw Truth/Reality. Disconnected from Divine free critical thinking. Disconnected from their once Divine Original right mind-set. Disconnected from the Cosmic Universe/Nature. Disconnected from the Divine Ethereal Essence Divine Intelligent Energy that revealed us to the planet, which is not a being, just Pure Divine Intelligent Energy.
If we are serious about seriousness as these marches...and the likes of, then we will KNOW, not believe, KNOW that REPARATIONS NOW is Divine Justice for Trayvon and us ALL.…